Than Vuong · VietFish 2026 Report ← Part 2
A technician testing shrimp samples in a processing plant laboratory
VietFish 2026 Report · Part 3 of 3

BAP changes the rules: the full picture of SPS 6.0, Feed Mill 3.3 and the new Cluster Program

Vietnam enters the "elevated risk" group in the testing module, a sustainable feed roadmap to 2030 — and some very specific deadlines.
Text & photos: Than Vuong · Speaker: Nguyễn Thị Thanh Bình, GSA

The two previous parts answered the question "Who is GSA?". This part is a detailed map of what is changing: a completely rewritten processing standard, a feed standard with a roadmap to 2030, a new certification program for small farms — and some very specific deadlines.

Ms. Nguyễn Thị Thanh Bình presenting at VietFish 2026
Ms. Nguyễn Thị Thanh Bình (GSA) presents the revisions in SPS 6.0 — effective from November 5, 2025. Photo: Than Vuong

01SPS 6.0 — the processing plant standard rewritten as "1 core + 10 modules"

The Seafood Processing Standard (SPS) 6.0 has been in effect since November 5, 2025 — the standard was launched in 2004 and applies to both farmed and wild-caught seafood. Version 6.0 improves audit efficiency, supports processors of wild-caught products, can be tailored to the conditions of each facility, and is written to be consistent with GFSI and SSCI. The new structure: one set of core clauses for everyone + 10 modules — of which Social Responsibility (2A) is mandatory, while the other modules are chosen according to the scope of production (as published on bapcertification.org).

The core has 4 new clauses: live seafood may only be bought from licensed commercial sources and must be legally harvested (1.1.1.8); non-potable water must be kept separate, with clearly marked pipes (3.11.9); there must be a procedure for designing and developing new products (3.16.3); solid by-products used as marine ingredients/animal feed must follow feed regulations (5.2.2.1).

Plus 11 revised clauses: the QMS adds Food Safety Culture (2.1.1); evaluating the effectiveness of HACCP training (2.4.3); risk assessment of banned substances (3.2.1); sanitation verification including Listeria spp in drains + SPC, Enterobacteriaceae (3.9.4); reduced heavy-metal testing of water/ice from 2 to 1 sample/year (3.11.1, 3.11.4); reduced Coliform testing from weekly to monthly (3.11.2, 3.11.7); a risk-based sampling plan (4.4.1); no use of non-accredited laboratories (4.5.1); corrective action when limits are exceeded (4.5.2). Low-risk areas are relaxed, high-risk areas are tightened — true to the spirit of risk-based assessment.

SPS 6.0 — one core, ten modules
Effective November 5, 2025 · consistent with GFSI & SSCI
Core clauses — apply to everyoneFood safety · legal · quality · traceability · social responsibility4 new clauses · 11 revisions
Social Responsibility2A — mandatory
Enhanced Social Responsibility2B — optional (ESM)
Ready-to-Eat (RTE) Foodsnew — 20 clauses
Animal WelfareAW1–AW6 · 11 clauses
Low-Acid Foodscanned · 9 clauses
Outsourced ProcessingOSP1–OSP11 · 12 clauses
Product Identity PreservationPIP1–PIP10 · 2 new
Product Testingmajor change — risk-based
Environment for remote, isolated plants15 clauses + effluent table
Wastewater DischargeEffluent Discharge
The "1 core + 10 modules" architecture of SPS 6.0 — graphic: thanvuong.vn
Slide of the 4 new core clauses of SPS 6.0
Original slide: the 4 new core clauses of SPS 6.0 (bilingual). Photo: Than Vuong

02Ten modules — which plant needs which module?

Ready-to-eat foods (RTE) — a new module, 20 clauses (RTE1–RTE20), 12 new clauses. It reduces cross-contamination for products eaten without further cooking: sashimi, surimi, pasteurized crab, hot/cold-smoked fish, acidified products, salted products. New content: disinfection of cooling water, control of factors that support Listeria monocytogenes, separate protective clothing and footwear for the RTE area, laundry, maintenance training, environmental monitoring including Listeria, SOPs to prevent pathogens, personal hygiene.

Animal welfare — mandatory for plants that receive live aquatic animals and slaughter them at the plant; 11 clauses (AW1–AW6): a transport SOP that ensures welfare (AW1); a transport log for every delivery, reviewed by management at least weekly (AW2); an SOP for holding live animals + corrective actions (AW3); a slaughter SOP, with verification of stunning effectiveness (AW4–AW5); all workers involved in transport, stunning and slaughter must be trained, with documentation (AW6).

Social responsibility — two options: the mandatory 2A, or the enhanced 2B (ESM) — an optional additional audit of management systems and practices for workers, so that plants are recognized for going further. Low-acid foods (canned, pH > 4.6, Aw > 0.85): 9 clauses to control Clostridium botulinum, Listeria monocytogenes. Outsourced processing: 12 clauses (OSP1–OSP11) — outsourced filleting, packing, freezing, cold storage and deboning are all in scope; products must return to the main facility and remain under full control. Product identity preservation: PIP1–PIP10 for facilities that claim multiple BAP stars; new: PIP7 forward and backward traceability of star-rated products, PIP10 excluded products may not use the BAP logo. Wastewater discharge (Effluent Discharge) for facilities that treat their own wastewater; and Environment for remote, isolated wild-catch processing plants: 15 clauses + a table of effluent parameters, including processing vessels.

03The Testing module — the biggest change: Vietnam enters the "elevated risk" group

Product testing moves to a risk-based ranking: Low — Elevated — High, based on 4 criteria: certification status (new/re-certification), geographic location, regulatory compliance/enforcement, testing results. Appendix 1 gives testing guidance; GSA assesses the risk directly.

Facilities in large-scale production regions that use antibiotics, or in countries with many shipments refused by the US FDA — especially newly registered facilities in China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand or Vietnam — are ranked Elevated. Having appeared on the US FDA Refusal List (pathogenic bacteria, banned antibiotics, histamine) within 12 months: High. Failing 3 consecutive tests: suspension. Elevated and High: testing for chemical residues and food-poisoning microbes is mandatory. A clean record of drug use from the pond is the cheapest shield.

Product testing — risk-based ranking
The risk level determines the frequency and scope of mandatory testing
Low risk
Lower-risk regions

Regions with good enforcement systems, not on the US FDA refusal list in the last 12 months.

Elevated risk
Mandatory residue testing

Large-scale production regions that use antibiotics, or countries with many shipments refused by the US FDA.

Vietnam is named explicitly — along with China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand.
High risk
Strictest oversight

Facilities newly registered after appearing on the US FDA refusal list (pathogenic bacteria, banned antibiotics, histamine) within 12 months.

⚠️ Failing 3 consecutive tests → certification suspended. Elevated and High: testing for chemical residues and food-poisoning microbes is mandatory.
The three risk levels of the Product Testing module — graphic: thanvuong.vn
Elevated Risk slide naming Vietnam
Original slide: the countries with Elevated Risk status, including Vietnam. Photo: Than Vuong

04Feed Mill 3.3 — feed mills and the 75 — 90 — 100% roadmap

Version 3.3 was published on September 8, 2025 and took effect on November 17, 2025, with applications submitted through Prism. The 7-part structure is unchanged; the changes are concentrated in clauses 4.5–4.11 (sustainability of the main ingredients: fishmeal, fish oil, soy, palm oil) and 7.3 (traceability).

Fishmeal and fish oil from wild fisheries: at least 75% (mass balance) must hold a GSSI-recognized certification and/or meet the Marin Trust Criteria; 90% from 2028; 100% from 2031 (4.5 — consistent with the official GSA announcement). The remainder must come from an active, approved Fishery Improvement Project (FIP) — Marin Trust, MSC IP, FisheryProgress.org (4.6); by July 1, 2027, any remaining shortfall must be backed by evidence of active participation in a FIP (4.7). By-products: non-threatened species, legally harvested (4.8).

Soy: at least 50% by mass balance from ProTerra, RTRS, SSAP or FEFAC-benchmarked sources (4.10); from January 1, 2026, a written commitment is required to buy soy that is 100% certified or verified DCF — no deforestation, no land conversion (4.10.1). Palm oil: RSPO certification (4.11). Traceability records under 7.3: ingredient type, species and FAO area, date received, supplier, production facility, unloading activity, quantity, lot size.

Slide of the sustainable fishmeal and fish oil roadmap
Original slide: the sustainable ingredient roadmap — clause 4.5, Feed Mill 3.3. Photo: Than Vuong

05Cluster Program 1.3 — a wide door for small farms

Issued on August 28, 2025, replacing version 1.2 from 2019. Three options: independent (10 farms = 10 applications, multiple audits, costly); cluster — a sponsoring organization (a cooperative, a lead company in the supply chain) coordinates: one certification body, one auditor, one audit for the whole cluster, no shared QMS required; group — with a Group entity, a Manager, a shared QMS and internal audits, the number of members audited on site drops sharply under a square-root formula, suitable for any scale, species or farming method.

Changes in 1.3: the separate checklist is dropped; the name of the manager/owner of each unit must be provided; the exception on the maximum number of units in a cluster is removed; facility boundaries must be submitted (KMZ file); the separate exception for mollusk clusters is removed; competence requirements for the cluster coordinator — organization, communication, English, problem solving.

Cluster Program 1.3 — ten farms, one audit
Issued August 28, 2025 · replaces version 1.2 (2019)
Old way — independent
Each farm handles everything on its own
Multiple certification bodies · multiple auditorsa separate contract for each farm
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
1 file
1 audit
10applications
10separate audits
×10cost & time
New way — Cluster
One focal point coordinates the whole cluster
Sponsoring organizationcooperative / lead company in the supply chain
Cluster coordinatororganization · communication · English · member oversight
farm 1
farm 2
farm 3
farm 4
farm 5
farm 6
farm 7
farm 8
farm 9
farm 10
1certification body
1auditor · 1 audit
↓much lower cost per farm
The Group model goes further: a Group entity, a Group Manager, a shared quality management system (QMS) and internal audits — the number of members that must be audited on site falls under a square-root formula (for example, a group of 20 farms audits only √20+1 ≈ 5 farms), suitable for any scale, species and farming method. A shared QMS is not required in the Cluster model.
Organizational structure of the three farm certification models — graphic: thanvuong.vn
Slide of BAP certification options for farms and hatcheries
Original slide: three certification options for farms and hatcheries. Photo: Than Vuong

06Prism and the responsible feed commitment

Currently only processing plants and feed mills submit applications through the online Prism platform; from October 14, 2026, all independent farms (finfish, crustaceans), mollusk farms and hatcheries must submit re-certification applications through Prism — this applies only to independent facilities; clusters and groups will switch over later. GSA has also launched a "Responsible Feed Commitment" page that brings together its guidance on sustainable ingredients.

6 deadlines

November 5, 2025 SPS 6.0 · November 17, 2025 Feed Mill 3.3 · January 1, 2026 DCF soy · October 14, 2026 Prism · July 1, 2027 FIP · 2028→2031 fishmeal 90%→100%. Those who read early will not have to sprint at the last minute.

Six deadlines businesses should pin to the calendar
As announced by GSA at VietFish 2026
November 5, 2025
SPS 6.0 takes effect

New version of the processing plant standard

November 17, 2025
Feed Mill 3.3 takes effect

Aquafeed mill standard

January 1, 2026
DCF soy

Written commitment: 100% certified / no deforestation, no land conversion

October 14, 2026
Prism becomes mandatory

Independent farms & hatcheries submit re-certification applications online

July 1, 2027
FIP participation deadline

For fishmeal and fish oil sources not yet certified

2028 → 2031
Sustainable fishmeal and fish oil

75% now → 90% from 2028 → 100% from 2031

Six deadlines in the BAP system — graphic: thanvuong.vn
Slide on the deadline for submitting applications through Prism
Original slide: from October 14, 2026, independent farms submit re-certification applications through Prism. Photo: Than Vuong
SourceSession "GSA/BAP standards update: Opportunities & solutions for accessing global markets" — Ms. Nguyễn Thị Thanh Bình, Global Seafood Alliance, VietFish 2026 (Ho Chi Minh City, August 20, 2026); SPS 6.0 · BAP Feed Mill Standard 3.3 · Cluster Program 1.3 according to the published slides and bapcertification.org.
Digital tools for farmers

Digitize your farm records with Nuôi Lời

Log feed, water conditions, cast-net sampling, medicines and costs right at the pond; export multi-sheet Excel reports that support traceability records in line with ASC and GMP — exactly what standards like BAP are asking for. Free, sign in with your phone number, no email needed.

Try Nuôi Lời →
Was this article useful to you?
What topic would you like Than Vuong to write more about?